securenowbot

Banyak sekali fitur-fitur menarik yang bisa kita dapat dari NOX. Seperti optimize performa biar kencang dan tidak lag, hingga setting virtual controller yang mana tidak semua emulator sejenis punya fitur ini.Emulator NOX, bagi saya sendiri cukup bermanfaat. Dengan emulator ini, saya bisa membuat banyak sekali referensi pendukung dari artikel-artikel Android yang saya buat di blog ini.Tapi saat membuat artikel, ada kalanya saya butuh suatu file yang ada di dalam harddisk, supaya bisa diakses di Android. Seperti gambar dan video.Karena repot kalau mesti copy data dari PC ke HP, terbesit di kepala saya. “ Kenapa gak pake NOX aja buat copy datanya”. Dari cara-cara yang saya baca dari berbagai sumber.

• Cara File Dari Usenet 2017

Ternyata lumayan beragam perbedaan langkah-langkah sharing filenya. Seperti butuh aplikasi pihak ketiga, atau mesti edit direktori file supaya bisa diakses.Yang jujur, buat saya agak ribet. Baca juga:Setelah saya searching lagi, sebenarnya developer NOX sendiri juga sudah membuat tutorialnya. Cara sharing file dari Windows ke NOX.

Dan ternyata tidak begitu sulit.Nah, ada 2 tutorial yang ingin saya buat disini. Yaitu:.

Cara copy file PC / Laptop ke NOX. Cara copy file NOX ke PC atau LaptopUntuk cara copy file dari harddisk ke NOX sangatlah mudah. Tapi untuk copy file dari NOX ke Windows, ini agak sedikit ribet.Tapi tenang saja, tidak seribet cara-cara pake aplikasi pihak ketiga yang saya bilang sebelumnya kok.Dibawah ini, akan saya jelaskan sampai tuntas tutorial cara mengcopy data dari laptop ke NOX atau sebaliknya.Langsung saja, berikut caranya.

Baca juga.

A diagram of Usenet servers and clients. The blue, green, and red dots on the servers represent the groups they carry. Arrows between servers indicate newsgroup group exchanges (feeds).

Arrows between clients and servers indicate that a user is subscribed to a certain group and reads or submits articles.Usenet ( ) is a worldwide distributed discussion system available on computers. It was developed from the general-purpose network architecture. And conceived the idea in 1979, and it was established in 1980. Users read and post messages (called articles or posts, and collectively termed news) to one or more categories, known as.

Usenet resembles a (BBS) in many respects and is the precursor to that are widely used today. Discussions are, as with web forums and BBSs, though posts are stored on the server sequentially. The name comes from the term 'users network'.A major difference between a BBS or web forum and Usenet is the absence of a central server and dedicated administrator. Usenet is distributed among a large, constantly changing conglomeration of servers that store and forward messages to one another via 'news feeds'. Individual users may read messages from and post messages to a local server, which may be operated by anyone.Usenet is culturally and historically significant in the networked world, having given rise to, or popularized, many widely recognized concepts and terms such as ', ', and '.

In the 1990s, before access to the Internet became commonly affordable, Usenet connections via 's dial-up networks made long-distance or worldwide discussions and other widespread, not needing a server, just (local) telephone service. Contents.Introduction Usenet was conceived in 1979 and publicly established in 1980, at the and, over a decade before the went online (and thus before the general public received access to the ), making it one of the oldest communications systems still in widespread use. It was originally built on the 'poor man's ', employing UUCP as its transport protocol to offer mail and file transfers, as well as announcements through the newly developed such as. The name 'Usenet' emphasizes its creators' hope that the organization would take an active role in its operation.The articles that users post to Usenet are organized into topical categories known as, which are themselves logically organized into hierarchies of subjects. For instance, and are within the sci.

hierarchy, for science. Or, and are in the talk. hierarchy. When a user subscribes to a newsgroup, the software keeps track of which articles that user has read.In most newsgroups, the majority of the articles are responses to some other article. The set of articles that can be traced to one single non-reply article is called a.

Most modern newsreaders display the articles arranged into threads and subthreads. For example, in the wine-making newsgroup; 'rec.crafts.winemaking,' someone might start a thread called; 'What's the best yeast?' And that thread or conversation might grow into dozens of replies long, by perhaps six or eight different authors. Over several days, that conversation about different wine yeasts might branch into several sub-threads in a tree-like form.When a user posts an article, it is initially only available on that user's news server.

Each news server talks to one or more other servers (its 'newsfeeds') and articles with them. In this fashion, the article is copied from and should eventually reach every server in the network. The later networks operate on a similar principle, but for Usenet it is normally the sender, rather than the receiver, who initiates transfers. Usenet was designed under conditions when networks were much slower and not always available. Many sites on the original Usenet network would connect only once or twice a day to batch-transfer messages in and out. This is largely because the network was typically used for transfers, and phone charges were lower at night.The format and transmission of Usenet articles is similar to that of Internet messages. The difference between the two is that Usenet articles can be read by any user whose news server carries the group to which the message was posted, as opposed to email messages, which have one or more specific recipients.Today, Usenet has diminished in importance with respect to,.

Usenet differs from such media in several ways: Usenet requires no personal registration with the group concerned; information need not be stored on a remote server; archives are always available; and reading the messages does not require a mail or web client, but a news client. However, it is now possible to read and participate in Usenet newsgroups to a large degree using ordinary Internet browsers since most newsgroups are now copied to several internet sites. The groups in are still widely used for data transfer.ISPs, news servers, and newsfeeds Many Internet service providers, and many other Internet sites, operate for their users to access. ISPs that do not operate their own servers directly will often offer their users an account from another provider that specifically operates newsfeeds. In early news implementations, the server and newsreader were a single program suite, running on the same system. Today, one uses separate newsreader client software, a program that resembles an email client but accesses Usenet servers instead. Some clients such as and provide both abilities.Not all ISPs run news servers.

A news server is one of the most difficult Internet services to administer because of the large amount of data involved, small customer base (compared to mainstream Internet services such as email and web access), and a disproportionately high volume of customer support incidents (frequently complaining of missing news articles that are not the ISP's fault). Some ISPs outsource news operation to specialist sites, which will usually appear to a user as though the ISP ran the server itself. Many sites carry a restricted newsfeed, with a limited number of newsgroups. Commonly omitted from such a newsfeed are foreign-language newsgroups and the hierarchy which largely carries software, music, videos and images, and accounts for over 99 percent of article data.There are also Usenet providers that specialize in offering service to users whose ISPs do not carry news, or that carry a restricted feed.See also for an overview of how news systems are implemented.Newsreaders Newsgroups are typically accessed with: applications that allow users to read and reply to postings in newsgroups. These applications act as to one or more news servers.

Historically, Usenet was associated with the operating system developed at, but newsreaders are now available for all major operating systems. Modern mail clients or 'communication suites' commonly also have an integrated newsreader. Often, however, these integrated clients are of low quality, compared to standalone newsreaders, and incorrectly implement Usenet protocols, standards and conventions. Many of these integrated clients, for example the one in 's Outlook Express, are disliked by purists because of their misbehavior.With the rise of the World Wide Web (WWW), web front-ends (web2news) have become more common. Web front ends have lowered the technical entry barrier requirements to that of one application and no Usenet NNTP server account. There are numerous websites now offering web based gateways to Usenet groups, although some people have begun filtering messages made by some of the web interfaces for one reason or another. Is one such web based front end and some can access Google Groups via news: protocol links directly.

Moderated and unmoderated newsgroups A minority of newsgroups are moderated, meaning that messages submitted by readers are not distributed directly to Usenet, but instead are emailed to the moderators of the newsgroup for approval. The moderator is to receive submitted articles, review them, and inject approved articles so that they can be properly propagated worldwide. Articles approved by a moderator must bear the Approved: header line. Moderators ensure that the messages that readers see in the newsgroup conform to the charter of the newsgroup, though they are not required to follow any such rules or guidelines.

Typically, moderators are appointed in the proposal for the newsgroup, and changes of moderators follow a succession plan.Historically, a mod. hierarchy existed before Usenet reorganization. Now, moderated newsgroups may appear in any hierarchy, typically with.moderated added to the group name.Usenet newsgroups in the are created by proposals called a Request for Discussion, or RFD.

The RFD is required to have the following information: newsgroup name, checkgroups file entry, and moderated or unmoderated status. If the group is to be moderated, then at least one moderator with a valid email address must be provided.

Other information which is beneficial but not required includes: a charter, a rationale, and a moderation policy if the group is to be moderated. Discussion of the new newsgroup proposal follows, and is finished with the members of the Big-8 Management Board making the decision, by vote, to either approve or disapprove the new newsgroup.Unmoderated newsgroups form the majority of Usenet newsgroups, and messages submitted by readers for unmoderated newsgroups are immediately propagated for everyone to see.

Minimal editorial content filtering vs propagation speed form one crux of the Usenet community. One little cited defense of propagation is canceling a propagated message, but few Usenet users use this command and some news readers do not offer, in part because article storage expires in relatively short order anyway. Almost all unmoderated Usenet groups have become collections of. Technical details Usenet is a set of protocols for generating, storing and retrieving news 'articles' (which resemble Internet mail messages) and for exchanging them among a readership which is potentially widely distributed. These protocols most commonly use a which propagates copies throughout a network of participating servers. Whenever a message reaches a server, that server forwards the message to all its network neighbors that haven't yet seen the article.

Only one copy of a message is stored per server, and each server makes it available on demand to the (typically local) readers able to access that server. The collection of Usenet servers has thus a certain character in that they share resources by exchanging them, the granularity of exchange however is on a different scale than a modern peer-to-peer system and this characteristic excludes the actual users of the system who connect to the news servers with a typical client-server application, much like an email reader.was the first formal specification of the messages exchanged by Usenet servers.

Cara File Dari Usenet 2017

It was superseded by and subsequently by and.In cases where unsuitable content has been posted, Usenet has support for automated removal of a posting from the whole network by creating a cancel message, although due to a lack of authentication and resultant abuse, this capability is frequently disabled. Copyright holders may still request the manual deletion of infringing material using the provisions of treaty implementations, such as the United States, but this would require giving notice to each individual news server administrator.On the Internet, Usenet is transported via the (NNTP) on 119 for standard, unprotected connections and on TCP port 563 for encrypted connections which is offered only by a few sites.Organization. The 'Big Nine' hierarchies of UsenetThe major set of worldwide newsgroups is contained within nine hierarchies, eight of which are operated under consensual guidelines that govern their administration and naming. A visual example of the many complex steps required to prepare data to be uploaded to Usenet newsgroups. These steps must be done again in reverse to download data from Usenet.Usenet was originally created to distribute text content encoded in the 7- character set. With the help of programs that encode 8-bit values into ASCII, it became practical to distribute as content.

Binary posts, due to their size and often-dubious copyright status, were in time restricted to specific newsgroups, making it easier for administrators to allow or disallow the traffic.The oldest widely used encoding method for binary content is, from the UUCP package. In the late 1980s, Usenet articles were often limited to 60,000 characters, and larger hard limits exist today.

Files are therefore commonly split into sections that require reassembly by the reader.With the header extensions and the and Quoted-Printable encodings, there was a new generation of binary transport. In practice, MIME has seen increased adoption in text messages, but it is avoided for most binary attachments. Some operating systems with attached to files use specialized encoding formats. For Mac OS, both and special MIME types are used.Other lesser known encoding systems that may have been used at one time were, and.In an attempt to reduce file transfer times, an informal file encoding known as was introduced in 2001.

It achieves about a 30% reduction in data transferred by assuming that most 8-bit characters can safely be transferred across the network without first encoding into the 7-bit ASCII space.The most common method of uploading large binary posts to Usenet is to convert the files into archives and create files for them. Parity files are used to recreate missing data when not every part of the files reaches a server.Binary retention time.

This is a list of some of the biggest binary groups. With 1341+ days retention, the (binary) Usenet storage (which binsearch.info indexes) is more than 33 (33000 ).Each news server generally allocates a certain amount of storage space for post content in each newsgroup.

When this storage has been filled, each time a new post arrives, old posts are deleted to make room for the new content. If the network bandwidth available to a server is high but the storage allocation is small, it is possible for a huge flood of incoming content to overflow the allocation and push out everything that was in the group before it. If the flood is large enough, the beginning of the flood will begin to be deleted even before the last part of the flood has been posted.Binary newsgroups are only able to function reliably if there is sufficient storage allocated to a group to allow readers enough time to download all parts of a binary posting before it is flushed out of the group's storage allocation. This was at one time how posting of undesired content was countered; the newsgroup would be flooded with random garbage data posts, of sufficient quantity to push out all the content to be suppressed. This has been compensated by service providers allocating enough storage to retain everything posted each day, including such spam floods, without deleting anything.The average length of time that posts are able to stay in the group before being deleted is commonly called the retention time. Generally the larger Usenet servers have enough capacity to archive several years of binary content even when flooded with new data at the maximum daily speed available.

A good binaries service provider must not only accommodate users of fast connections (3 megabit) but also users of slow connections (256 kilobit or less) who need more time to download content over a period of several days or weeks.Major Usenet service providers have a retention time of more than 4 years.This results in more than 33 (33000 ) of storage.In part because of such long retention times, as well as growing Internet speeds, Usenet is also used by individual users to store data in a practice called Usenet backup, or uBackup. While commercial providers offer more, storing data on Usenet is free of charge (although access to Usenet itself may not be). The method requires the uploader to cede control over the distribution of the data; the files are automatically disseminated to all Usenet providers exchanging data for the news group it is posted to. In general the user must. The data is typically because it is available to anyone to download the backup files.

After the files are uploaded, having multiple copies spread to different geographical regions around the world decreases the chances of its loss.Legal issues While binary newsgroups can be used to distribute completely legal user-created works, open-source software, and public domain material, some binary groups are used to illegally distribute commercial software, copyrighted media, and pornographic material.ISP-operated Usenet servers frequently block access to all alt.binaries. groups to both reduce network traffic and to avoid related legal issues. Commercial Usenet service providers claim to operate as a telecommunications service, and assert that they are not responsible for the user-posted binary content transferred via their equipment. In the United States, Usenet providers can qualify for protection under the, provided that they establish a mechanism to comply with and respond to takedown notices from copyright holders.Removal of copyrighted content from the entire Usenet network is a nearly impossible task, due to the rapid propagation between servers and the retention done by each server.

Petitioning a Usenet provider for removal only removes it from that one server's retention cache, but not any others. It is possible for a special post cancellation message to be distributed to remove it from all servers, but many providers ignore messages by standard policy, because they can be easily falsified and submitted by anyone. For a takedown petition to be most effective across the whole network, it would have to be issued to the origin server to which the content has been posted, before it has been propagated to other servers. Removal of the content at this early stage would prevent further propagation, but with modern high speed links, content can be propagated as fast as it arrives, allowing no time for content review and takedown issuance by copyright holders.Establishing the identity of the person posting illegal content is equally difficult due to the trust-based design of the network.

Like email, servers generally assume the header and origin information in a post is true and accurate. However, as in SMTP email, Usenet post headers are easily falsified so as to obscure the true identity and location of the message source.

In this manner, Usenet is significantly different from modern P2P services; most P2P users distributing content are typically immediately identifiable to all other users by their, but the origin information for a Usenet posting can be completely obscured and unobtainable once it has propagated past the original server.Also unlike modern P2P services, the identity of the downloaders is hidden from view. On P2P services a downloader is identifiable to all others by their network address.

On Usenet, the downloader connects directly to a server, and only the server knows the address of who is connecting to it. Some Usenet providers do keep usage logs, but not all make this logged information casually available to outside parties such as the. The existence of anonymising gateways to USENET also complicates the tracing of a postings true origin.History. UUCP/Usenet Logical Map — June 1, 1981 / mods by S.

—, 1992 Decline Sascha Segan of said in 2008 that 'Usenet has been dying for years'. Segan said that some people pointed to the in 1993 as the beginning of Usenet's decline. Segan believes that when pornographers and software began putting large (non-text) files on Usenet by the late 1990s, Usenet and traffic increased correspondingly. Internet service providers questioned why they needed to host space for pornography and unauthorized software.

When the opened an investigation on who used Usenet, many ISPs dropped all Usenet access or access to the.In response, John Biggs of said 'As long as there are folks who think a is better than a mouse, the original text-only will live on'.discontinued Usenet access in 2005. In May 2010, whose implementation had started Usenet more than 30 years earlier, decommissioned its Usenet server, citing low usage and rising costs.After 32 years, the Usenet news service link at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (news.unc.edu) was retired on February 4, 2011.Usenet traffic changes Over time, the amount of Usenet traffic has steadily increased. As of 2010 the number of all text posts made in all Big-8 newsgroups averaged 1,800 new messages every hour, with an average of 25,000 messages per day. However, these averages are minuscule in comparison to the traffic in the binary groups. Much of this traffic increase reflects not an increase in discrete users or newsgroup discussions, but instead the combination of massive automated spamming and an increase in the use of.binaries newsgroups in which large files are often posted publicly. A small sampling of the change (measured in feed size per day) follows. ^ From Usenet to CoWebs: interacting with social information spaces, Christopher Lueg, Danyel Fisher, Springer (2003),.

January 5, 2016, at the, Jargon File Archive. August 4, 2016, at the, Netizens Netbook by Ronda Hauben and Michael Hauben.

From the original on September 15, 2012. Pre-Internet; Usenet needing 'just local telephone service' in most larger towns, depends on the number of local dial-up 'nodes' operated free of charge by hobbyist 'SysOps' (as FidoNet echomail variations or via gateways with the Usenet news hierarchy. This is virtual Usenet or newsgroups access, not true Usenet.) The participating SysOps typically carry 6 - 30 Usenet newsgroups each, and will often add another on request. If a desired newsgroup was not available locally, a user would need to dial to another city to download the desired news and upload one's own posts. In all cases it is desirable to hang up as soon as possible and read/write offline, making 'newsreader' software commonly used to automate the process. ^ Emerson, Sandra L. (October 1983).

Retrieved January 31, 2015. September 24, 2012, at the ', James Ellis and Tom Truscott, in First Official Announcement of USENET, NewsDemon (K&L Technologies, Inc), 1979. Lehnert, Wendy G.; Kopec, Richard (2007).

Addison Wesley. From the original on June 30, 2012. Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science. Kozierok, Charles M. The TCP/IP guide: a comprehensive, illustrated Internet protocols reference. No Starch Press.

1401. One way to virtually read and participate in Usenet newsgroups using an ordinary Internet browser is to do an internet search on a known newsgroup, such as the high volume forum: 'sci.physics'. Retrieved April 28, 2019. October 9, 2008. From the original on July 30, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. Jain, Dominik (July 30, 2006).

From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2007. October 13, 2008. From the original on July 13, 2012.

October 13, 2008. Archived from on April 26, 2008.

Retrieved June 29, 2009. From the original on May 25, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 12, 2012.

Archived from on August 4, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. Archived from on July 19, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. October 25, 1990. From the original on September 21, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. July 7, 2010. Archived from on July 22, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010.

Donath, Judith (May 23, 2014). Today, Usenet still exists, but it is an unsociable morass of spam, porn, and pirated software. March 22, 2015.

From the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 7, 2015. Groups filled with spam, massive fights took place against spammers and over what to do about the spam.

People stopped using their email addresses in messages to avoid harvesting. People left the net. From the original on May 18, 2015.

Retrieved May 7, 2015.many of the newsgroups have since been overrun with junk messages. September 18, 2012, at the, Announcement, undated. From the original on July 12, 2012., CNET, May 4, 2010.

From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2016. From the original on September 4, 2012.

Retrieved October 23, 2012. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2012. From the original on September 18, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2012. From the original on September 10, 2012. Archived from on February 15, 2008.

Retrieved June 29, 2009.Until authenticated cancels catch on, there are no options to avoid forged cancels and allow unforged ones. Microsoft knowledgebase article stating that many servers ignore cancel messages. From the original on July 19, 2012. (PDF). (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2013. Retrieved December 14, 2010.every part of a Usenet post may be forged apart from the left most portion of the 'Path:' header.

From the original on July 23, 2012.:. June 10, 1995.

From the original on July 24, 2012. Retrieved December 5, 2014. From the original on July 31, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. June 9, 2005. Archived from on July 8, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 14, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. LaQuey, Tracy (1990). The User's directory of computer networks. Digital Press.

From the original on July 15, 2010. Retrieved September 15, 2014. From the original on August 12, 2014. Retrieved September 15, 2014. Hauben, Michael and Hauben, Ronda. ' June 10, 2015, at the '. First Monday vol.

3 num.August 8, 3 1998. Haddadi, H. ' November 17, 2015, at the '. University College London. Horton, Mark (December 11, 1990). From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2007.

Huston, Geoff (1999). ISP survival guide: strategies for running a competitive ISP. From the original on September 5, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010.

Tim Berners-Lee (August 6, 1991).:. Retrieved June 4, 2007. Torvalds, Linus.:. Retrieved September 9, 2006. Marc Andreessen (March 15, 1993).:. From the original on June 16, 2006. Retrieved June 4, 2007.

Kaltenbach, Susan (December 2000). (PDF) from the original on July 14, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2010. Verb Doubling: Doubling a verb may change its semantics, Soundalike Slang: Punning jargon, The -P convention: A LISPy way to form questions, Overgeneralization: Standard abuses of grammar, Spoken Inarticulations: Sighing and ing, Anthropomorphization: online components were named 'Homunculi,' daemons,' etc., and there were also 'confused' programs.

Comparatives: Standard comparatives for design quality. Campbell, K. (October 1, 1994). Archived from on November 25, 2007. Retrieved September 24, 2010. Segan, Sascha (July 31, 2008).

From the original on September 9, 2012. Retrieved July 21, 2017.

Sascha Segan (July 31, 2008). From the original on September 9, 2012. Retrieved May 8, 2011.

'. From the original on July 16, 2012.' August 1, 2008. Retrieved on May 8, 2011. Cara Bonnett (May 17, 2010).

From the original on July 11, 2012. Retrieved May 24, 2010. Andrew Orlowski (May 20, 2010).

The Register. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved May 24, 2010. ^.

Archived from on October 16, 2006. Retrieved December 14, 2010. Archived from on October 16, 2006. Retrieved December 14, 2010. Rosencrance, Lisa.

From the original on July 22, 2012. June 8, 2008. Retrieved on April 30, 2009. DeJean, David. 'Usenet: Not Dead Yet.' Tuesday October 7, 2008.

October 7, 2008. Retrieved on April 30, 2009. June 9, 2009. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2009. Hu, Jim. From the original on July 23, 2012.'

January 25, 2005. Retrieved on May 1, 2009. January 25, 2005. From the original on July 22, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. Bode, Karl. From the original on July 31, 2012. August 31, 2009. Retrieved on October 24, 2009. '. From the original on September 21, 2012.

' Verizon Central Support. Retrieved on October 24, 2009. From the original on June 22, 2003.

Retrieved September 1, 2011. January 25, 2005. From the original on August 29, 2008.

Retrieved September 1, 2011. August 31, 2009. From the original on March 6, 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2011.

September 16, 2008. From the original on December 6, 2014. Retrieved December 5, 2014. April 22, 2010. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved September 3, 2011. Geeknet, Inc.

April 21, 2010. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2011. April 27, 2010. From the original on September 12, 2012.

Retrieved September 1, 2011. From the original on July 10, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010.:. December 21, 1982. From the original on January 29, 2011. Retrieved December 5, 2014. From the original on July 8, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 24, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 15, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 12, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 17, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 9, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 15, 2012.

Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010. From the original on July 8, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010.

Segan, Sascha (January 1, 1970). From the original on September 9, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2010.

Strawbridge, Matthew (2006). Netiquette: Internet Etiquette in the Age of the Blog. Software Reference.

53. Cullen, Drew (February 12, 2001). From the original on September 21, 2012.

Wiseman, David. February 9, 2005, at, csd.uwo.ca. Mieszkowski, Katharine.

Archived from on July 10, 2012. ', archive.salon.com (January 7, 2002). Feldman, Ian. From the original on July 7, 2012., 'TidBITS' (February 10, 1992).

From the original on July 9, 2012. (December 21, 2001). Poulsen, Kevin (October 7, 2009).

From the original on March 9, 2017. Retrieved March 12, 2017. Braga, Matthew (February 13, 2015). From the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.

Edwards, Douglas (2011). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Pp.Further reading. Bruce Jones, archiver (1997).

Covering 1990–1997. Communication.ucsd.edu., Ronda Hauben, and (April 27, 1997).

Wiley-IEEE Computer Society P. CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list. Bryan Pfaffenberger (December 31, 1994). The USENET Book: Finding, Using, and Surviving Newsgroups on the Internet. Addison Wesley. Kate Gregory; Jim Mann; Tim Parker & Noel Estabrook (June 1995).

Que. Mark Harrison (July 1995). The USENET Handbook (Nutshell Handbook). O'Reilly. Henry Spencer; David Lawrence (January 1998). O'Reilly. Don Rittner (June 1997).

Rittner's Field Guide to Usenet. MNS Publishing. Konstan, J., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Gordon, L., and Riedl, J. (March 1997).

'GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news'. Communications of the ACM. 40 (3): 77–87. CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list. Miller, B.; Riedl, J.; Konstan, J.

(January 1997). Proceedings of the 1997 Usenix Winter Technical Conference.

Archived from on January 5, 2007. Retrieved June 27, 2006. Linux Magazine. Retrieved February 13, 2007. (June 15, 2006). Retrieved June 4, 2007.; Wyrick, Brian (January 29, 2007). Archived from on October 25, 2011.

Retrieved June 4, 2007.External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to. at. (USEnet article FORmat), tools.ietf.org.: Early Usenet news articles: 1981 to 1982., quux.org.: 2,000,000 articles from early 1980s to July 1991. Archived from on June 21, 2007.

Social Accounting Reporting Tool. A comprehensive history of the Internet, including Usenet. Livinginternet.com. A comprehensive list of Usenet terminology.